The honest number right now is no number.
Scam Finder started with an empty database. A report goes here once a month, counted from real records. Until there’s something to count, these lines stay blank.
Completed checks
Not enough activity to report this metric
Published experiences
Not enough activity to report this metric
Upheld corrections
Not enough activity to report this metric
Time to first case update
Not enough activity to report this metric
Checks with insufficient coverage
Not enough activity to report this metric
- Methodology version
- None published
- Coverage limitations
- None to report yet
- Policy changes
- None to report yet
The rules are public before the numbers are.
Every figure will state its unit, date range, denominator, exclusions and calculation version. Each one uses what’s visible and retained on the day it’s counted.
Completed checks
Checks that produced a complete or partial report during the month. Attempts are shown separately.
- Unit
- Distinct check runs
- Period
- One calendar month, UTC
- Denominator
- None. This is a count.
- Left out
- Retries, cancelled and failed jobs, test and monitoring runs
Split into checks people asked for and scheduled refreshes, so a refresh never passes as a person helped.
Published experiences
Reviews visible on Scam Finder at the moment the month’s snapshot is taken.
- Unit
- Reviews, one per review
- Period
- A single cutoff at month end
- Denominator
- None. This is a count.
- Left out
- Revisions, replies, and anything withdrawn or removed by the cutoff
Upheld corrections
Material correction cases resolved in the month where the challenge was upheld or partly upheld.
- Unit
- Distinct cases
- Period
- One calendar month, UTC
- Denominator
- None. This is a count.
- Left out
- Linked duplicates, which count as one case
Time to first case update
The median time from receiving a case to the first substantive update on it.
- Unit
- Median duration
- Period
- Cases closed in the month
- Denominator
- Eligible closed cases that had such an update
- Left out
- The automatic receipt, which isn’t an update
Closed cases with no update aren’t dropped quietly. They’re reported separately, or held back if the group is too small.
Checks with insufficient coverage
The share of completed checks where required coverage was missing.
- Unit
- Percentage of reports
- Period
- One calendar month, UTC
- Denominator
- Completed-check reports in the same month
- Left out
- Nothing further. With a zero or withheld denominator, no rate is shown.
This measures how often evidence ran out. It says nothing about how safe any website is.
A gap will always say why it’s a gap.
- Too little happenedNot enough activity to report this metric
- There’s nothing to count, or too little to mean anything. Every line on this page reads like this today.
- Held backGroup too small to publish
- A small group could point to a real person or case. Related breakdowns go too, because subtraction would reveal the hidden figure.
- No rateNo rate for this period
- The denominator is zero or withheld. Printing 0% would claim something that never happened.
- Report lateGeneration failed. Showing the last valid month.
- The last safe report stays up with its age marked. A failed month is never filled in with an estimate.
- CorrectedCorrected. Replaces the earlier figures for this month.
- A wrong number gets a dated replacement. If someone’s private data is removed, reports that depended on it can be withdrawn.
How a month gets printed.
The month ends
Each report covers the last full calendar month in UTC.
Records are counted
Figures come from the underlying event and publication records, so a broken running tally can’t change them.
Totals are tested
The sums run against test data with known answers before anything goes out.
One version goes live
The report is released whole and versioned. No AI writes or explains the numbers.
Flattering numbers stay off the bill.
Traffic and warning counts look impressive and prove very little. A count of users would need a defined way of measuring them, and there isn’t one. Money saved would be a guess.
Nothing here identifies a person or names a website’s complaints. Reports also avoid overlapping releases that could expose a single case.
SCAM FINDER
LINES THAT STAY OFF THIS REPORT
- People helpedNOT MEASURED
- Money savedNOT INFERRED
- Live accuracyNOT CLAIMED
- Complaints per websiteNOT PUBLISHED
- Names, cases, sanctionsNOT PUBLISHED
- Model prompts, security detailNOT PUBLISHED
NO ESTIMATES. NO ROUNDING UP.
Every line starts with one real check.
Got a website you’re unsure about? A completed check is counted once, in next month’s report, and your details aren’t.