Point at the mistake. Show the source.
You can challenge a specific finding or review without a claim, an account or any payment. Cases are decided automatically against a deadline, and each one ends with a reasoned outcome.
Refund terms on the delivery pagecontradictmatch the returns page.
Four problems, four routes.
An old detail about your website
Propose a factual update
Your statement appears as the website's own claim. Where it differs from what a check observed, both stay visible and separate.
Claimed representativesA finding that's wrong
Challenge that finding
Point at the exact statement on the exact version of your page, say what's wrong and propose the correction.
Anyone. No claim, account or paymentA review that breaks the rules
Challenge that review
Name the concrete problem, such as private details, a threat or a statement a source contradicts. A review you dislike stays up.
Anyone. No claim, account or paymentA decision you think is wrong
Appeal it
A separate automated process looks again at the original material, your reasons and any new evidence. It treats the first decision as context only.
The person the decision affects
A challenge that can succeed.
- The statement
- Finding, checked 28 October 2026: “Refund terms on the delivery page contradict the returns page.”
- The problem
- The delivery page was out of date. It was changed on 30 October, so the two pages now match.
- Proposed correction
- Remove the contradiction from the current version of the report.
- Evidence
- harbour-candles.test/delivery and harbour-candles.test/returns, both showing the 30-day refund wording.
You can attach private evidence and a contact, and both stay private. Remove customer details first. With no contact, your notice is still acted on, but we can't follow up with you.
What moves a case, and what doesn't.
Works
- The exact words you dispute, quoted
- A public source that contradicts them, with a link and date
- The current page, if your site changed after the check date
- The specific rule a review breaks, and the part that breaks it
Doesn't work
“This is false”, on its ownLots of people reporting the same thingYour “Website control checked” badgeHaving refunded the reviewer
Every case ends in one of four stamps.
Upheld
The statement is corrected or withdrawn in a new version.
Partly upheld
The part you showed to be wrong is corrected. The rest stands.
Not upheld
It stays, and you get the reason.
Insufficient support
The disputed interpretation is withheld. Supported facts stay.
A correction reaches your page, search results, timeline and saved alerts. If you disagree, you can ask for one automated reconsideration, and new evidence can reopen a case later. Neither step is a human review.
shop.harbour-candles.test / checked 28 October 2026
The badge means exactly those words.
- What it says
- Someone with an account on Scam Finder published our one-time value on this exact website, on the date shown.
- What it doesn't say
- That the business is trustworthy, safe or registered, or that any review or finding is right. A scammer can control their own website too.
- When it goes
- It lasts while the claim is active. Claims expire and need a recheck, and a claim can be disputed or revoked.
Last reviewed November 2026. General guidance, not legal or financial advice.